 |
Lower
costs for creating new protocols |
|
- |
The
detailed tests in our guidelines
reduce from-scratch test writing,
resulting in productivity
improvements of up to 70% -- and
reduction in contractor hiring |
|
- |
Overall
validation-team costs can be cut
by 10-15%, with payback in months. |
|
Shorter
schedules for starting new lines
and facilities |
|
- |
Creating
new tests takes less time |
|
- |
Validation
reviews are faster (standard
format and content and consistent
level of detail) |
|
A
faster path to standardization
(guidelines are an industry-tested
starting point) |
|
- |
Without
our guidelines, small companies
lack resources to create standards |
|
- |
While
large companies’ standardization
efforts often bog down in
committee. |
|
Consequent
benefits of improved
standardization |
|
- |
Reduced
regulatory risk |
|
- |
Lower
training costs. |
|
|
